Childbearing, freedom and equality The women's liberation movement sees abortion rights as vital for gender equality.
John Harris gives an example7 suppose I own a life-saving drug, and have nothing planned for its use other than placing it on my shelf. Yet, attempts to pass protective legislation insuring that women are given information about risks and alternatives to abortion and scientifically accurate information about the developing unborn child are routinely opposed and challenged by abortion advocates.
Vieira is an attorney practicing constitutional law. What is even more incomprehensible is that some women accept this specious reasoning and actually fight to keep the ability to legally kill their unborn child as a claimed "right".
It is noted by John Harris18 that a man is not entitled to violate a woman for the purpose of impregnating her—that is rape—so then it follows 15 A Defence of Abortion, pp 16 The Sceptical Feminist, p 17 Ibid. Most of us agree with these laws, even though they restrict personal freedoms, because they protect the rights and interests of others whose personal freedoms they directly or indirectly violate.
It directly involves the life of another person and therefore becomes the concern of a decent society. At Secular Pro-Life, we do believe that women have a right to make reproductive decisions.
Therefore, it should be her decision alone to decide whether her unborn child lives or dies. This is not an argument, merely a fiat statement. Although the unborn entity is attached to its mother, it is not part of her.
LFL explains and defends the libertarian case against abortion choice. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood In summary: First, a woman can control her own reproduction in three ways: Watch this video… For further reading on abortion issues Francis J. Neither of these claims squarely supports the pro-abortionists.
When you reach this point, remind your listeners that this way of reasoning threatens everyone's right to life. Provided with permission by Summit Ministries and the author.
Beckwith, Politically Correct Death: Michael Tooley offers an example that he believes analogises this argument14 there is a pleasurable act that I practice.
Though this is a logical conclusion of abortion-rights thinking, if carried out in our society it would ultimately mean the end of all human rights and social justice. Similarly, a woman has the right to terminate her pregnancy if its continuation instigates a degree of illness that is severe enough to warrant that decision.
Let's look more closely at the argument that "a woman has the right to control her own body. No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother.
Certainly a woman has a right to control her own body, but the unborn entity, though for a time living inside her body, is not part of her body. Although the unborn entity is attached to its mother, it is not part of her.
It disrupts her education. Answering this argument also allows the pro-lifer to bring attention to the least understood facet of the abortion debate: Beyond this basic contention, proponents further claim that the mother has the "right" to privacy, the "right" to choose, and the "right" to equal protection, all of which require a "right" to abortion.
Our reasoning is expressly scientific and philosophical rather than either pragmatic or religious, or merely political or emotional.
Slogans like "Keep your laws off my ovaries" are simply a distraction from the power of the truth about the unborn's life. Beckwith, adapted from a series in Christian Research Journal, Spring All people are subject to various restrictions on what they do with their bodies - and some of these restrictions laws against suicide or euthanasia are just as invasive.
Even a trespasser on someone else's land does not thereby become the landowner's property, in the sense that the landowner may do whatever he will with the trespasser. A pregnancy to a woman is perhaps one of the most determinative aspects of her life.
The issue of abortion is not personal and private.
If women are not allowed to abort an unwanted foetus they are deprived of this right. Therefore, in my opinion; a woman holds considerable rights; but they are only relative to the foetuses level of development.
The conceptus is a genetically distinct entity with its own unique and individual gender, blood type, bone-structure, and genetic code. But if the foetus is believed to be a person, then I do not think any argument of ownership can hold up against the soundness of the given examples.
Assuming we are not sociopaths, however, we naturally condemn Jane's hypothetical actions as inhumane and morally repugnant. But do they have a right to do what they please to their fetuses.
Hence, abortion is not justified, since no one's right to personal autonomy is so strong that it permits the arbitrary execution of others. While pregnancy is a temporary condition, abortion produces a permanent condition—the death of a person.
An Argument in Favor of Abortion Because It Is a Woman's Right to Choose What She Does With Her Body PAGES 1. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: abortion, pro choice. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University.
Exactly what I needed. A n extremely popular argument asserts that because a woman has a right to control her own body, she therefore has a right to undergo an abortion for any reason she deems fit.
Although it is not obvious that either the law or sound ethical reasoning supports such a strong view of personal autonomy (e.g., laws against prostitution and suicide), this pro.
On the other hand, it is argued that a woman has a right to choose what happens within her own body, and is therefore justified in deciding to have her foetus removed if she so wishes. Even a liberal view is problematic; these tend to take the view that it is permissible for an abortion to take place before a certain stage in the foetuses.
Let’s look more closely at the argument that “a woman has the right to control her own body.” Certainly she has the right to control the use of her arm by choosing to swing her arm. However, that right, stops when her arm approaches the tip of my nose.
A n extremely popular argument asserts that because a woman has a right to control her own body, she therefore has a right to undergo an abortion for any reason she deems fit.
Although it is not obvious that either the law or sound ethical reasoning supports such a strong view of personal autonomy (e.g., laws against prostitution and suicide), this pro-choice argument still logically fails even if we hypothetically.
Jul 20, · Abortion is an important element of women's rights because women are more affected by the abortion debate than men, both individually (if they are considering an abortion) and as a gender.An argument in favor of abortion because it is a womans right to choose what she does with her body